2024 Curcini v. county of alameda

Curcini v. county of alameda

Author: osdq

August undefined, 2024

WebJul 1, 2008 · Curcini v. County of Alameda California Court of Appeals, First District, … WebPlaintiffs filed a class action complaint alleging causes of action for violations of the Labor Code and the Industrial Welfare Commission's (IWC) wage orders based on the City's alleged failure to pay workers employed as pages and recreation leader specialists wages at or above the statewide minimum wage.

14 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION - Justia Law

WebPatricia S. Curley (born October 25, 1946) is an American lawyer and retired judge. She … WebJun 5, 2008 · Curcini and Jones worked for the County of Alameda from February 2002 … haoran luo

Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629

WebSep 16, 2008 · In Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 79 … Webpetitions state legally sufficient claims under any theory. (See Curcini, at p. 637.) If the … WebMay 1, 2024 · (Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 637.) That is, we independently "determine whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action." (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) In making this determination, " '[w]e treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not ... primal painting san jose

Curcini v. county of alameda

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION …

WebCurcini v. County of Alameda, California Court of Appeals 2008. Receive free daily … WebJun 15, 2009 · CARSON CURCINI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF …

Did you know?

WebJun 5, 2008 · Curcini v. County of Alameda, No. A115652. DocumentCited authorities … Web(Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 ... (Satten v. Webb (2002) 99 Cal.App.4th 365, 375) as well as all judicially noticed matters (Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081). Below, we summarize the allegations of the cross-complaint. Bounds is an 88-year-old widow. At all relevant times she was the trustee of

WebDiv. Two upheld a judgment in favor of Alameda County, concluding that issues of overtime pay, meal and rest breaks, and payment for denying meal and rest breaks, addressed matters of “compensation” within the county’s exclusive constitutional purview. Carson Curcini, Kinwood Devore and Johnny Jones worked as chaplains at the Santa Rita Jail. WebCarson Curcini and other fellow chaplains at a county jail brought a lawsuit against the …

WebCurcini v. County of Alameda (2008)164 Cal.App.4th 629 , -- Cal.Rptr.3d -- [No. …

WebApr 13, 2012 · The issue of whether the provision regarding commercial drivers applies to counties and charter cities is currently being litigated in California courts, based on the holdings in Curcini v. City of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4 th 629 and Dimon v. County of Los Angeles (2008) 166 Cal.App.4 th 1276.

WebCurcini v. County of Alameda. Filed 6/5/08 Curcini v. County of Alameda CA1/2. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS. California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). prilleltensky isaacWebFeb 25, 2024 · County of Los Angeles (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1276, 1284, 83 Cal.Rptr.3d 576 ( Dimon) [finding conflict between state meal period requirements and county charter where "MOU specifically covers meal periods" in a different manner from state requirements]; Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 648, 79 … primal joint support vitamin storeWebCurcini v. County of Alameda In Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629 (Curcini) [no petn. for review filed], the court considered a claim very similar to the one advanced in this case. In Curcini, several county employees sued Alameda County—a charter county—for, among other things, violation of the state laws haori jacketWebJun 13, 2024 · Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629 ..... 27, 28 DeVita v. City of Napa (1995) 9 Cal.4th 763 ..... 25 Dimon v. County of Los Angeles (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1276 ..... 27 Driscoll v. Superior Court ... haos asian cuisineWebJul 17, 2024 · (Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 650.) Appellant contends that the continuous violation doctrine is an evidentiary issue that cannot be resolved on demurrer. Our courts have held to the contrary. (See Acuna v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 1402, 1406 (Acuna); Alch v. haorenka.netWebAs alleged in the complaints, appellants Curcini, Devore and Jones (chaplains) are … haos asian cuisine menuWebMay 22, 2024 · 30 Cal.App.4th at p. 285; Dimon v. County of Los Angeles (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 1276, 1279, 1281; Curcini v. County of Alameda (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 629, 643.) So while the Legislature can impose procedures regarding labor relations, in cannot impose substantive requirements that interfere with the county’s ultimate right to set … haori silk